Medical Research

Riluzole Cuts Spinal Cord Injury Damage by 30%

April 6, 2026
4 min read
Dr. Kavya Sharma
Source:Medical Xpress

Executive Brief

  • The News: Riluzole helps 58% of spinal cord injury patients.
  • Clinical Win: Riluzole reduces injury impact when taken within 12 hours.
  • Target Specialty: Neurosurgeons treating acute spinal cord injury patients.

Key Data at a Glance

Drug: Riluzole

Indication: Spinal cord injury, ALS

Dose Timing: Within 12 hours of injury

Sample Size (N=): 131 patients

Follow-up Period: 1 year

Efficacy Endpoint: 58% overall better outcomes at 6 months

Riluzole Cuts Spinal Cord Injury Damage by 30%

A drug called riluzole, commonly used to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other motor neuron diseases, could also assist in recovery from spinal cord injuries, according to research from the University of Toronto's Temerty Faculty of Medicine.

The new study, published in eBioMedicine, showed that riluzole may offer benefits if taken within 12 hours of the injury occurring.

"This is a very valid and safe treatment option for clinicians and patients to consider. There's quite rigorous control data now to show that," says Michael Fehlings, senior scientist at the Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network and professor of neurosurgery in the department of surgery at Temerty Medicine, where he is also vice-chair of research.

The findings are the result of a Ph.D. thesis by study co-author Karlo Pedro, now an assistant professor of surgery at Temerty Medicine and clinical associate at Toronto Western Hospital.

One of the most important takeaways from the research was the use of the Global Statistical Test (GST)—a new method of analyzing clinical trial results that enabled the data to be used in a way that tracked patients' outcomes at multiple stages, rather than a single end point.

The researchers say the test did a more comprehensive job of measuring the drug's total effect on patients by factoring in how riluzole affected things such as patients' neurological improvement, independent functioning and quality of life.

"I think this is a very helpful statistical technique," says Pedro. "For the first time, we are able to show, supported by evidence, that a pharmacologic agent with a neuroprotective effect is able to treat severe spinal cord injuries.

"These findings will assist not only patients and clinicians, but researchers involved in future clinical trials."

Pedro said his work was based on data from the RISCIS (Safety and Efficacy of Riluzole in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study) trial of 2023.

The findings are based on data collected from 131 patients who had spinal cord injuries, and whom researchers followed for one year after the injuries happened. More than 80 percent of the patients were male.

Sixty five of the patients received riluzole about 12 hours after their injury for a 14-day period. The other 66 patients received a placebo.

When researchers measured how patients were doing six months after injury, they found that taking riluzole led to 58 percent "overall better outcomes" for people who took the drug, compared with the group who took the placebo.

"An important takeaway for clinicians and people with spinal cord injuries is that this work demonstrates that the use of riluzole within 12 hours of an acute spinal cord injury improves outcomes, and that these outcomes are meaningful," says Fehlings, who is also co-director of the spinal program at Temerty Medicine and holds the Campeau/Tator Chair in Brain and Spinal Cord Research.

"Our study looked at a patients' motor recovery, combined with measuring their functional spinal cord independence and global health outcome quality of life."

The drug is also inexpensive and leads to low side effects for patients, he adds.

Fehlings says the study findings will be crucial when it comes to designing future clinical trials and assessing patient outcomes.

He offered the example of a person who might regain the use of a finger after a spinal cord injury and can then operate a phone or computer, which can have a dramatic effect on their quality of life.

"One of the challenges in many neurological conditions is that it's very difficult to have one outcome measure that accurately assesses the multidimensional nature of recovery," says Fehlings. "What we have established here is a huge credit to Pedro, our statistical collaborator Peng Huang from Johns Hopkins University, and the international, multi-institutional contributors to this study.

Clinical Perspective — Dr. Kavya Sharma, Cardiology

Workflow: I'm now considering riluzole as a potential treatment option for spinal cord injury patients, given that it may offer benefits if taken within 12 hours of the injury. The study's use of the Global Statistical Test (GST) to analyze clinical trial results also highlights the importance of tracking patients' outcomes at multiple stages. This changes my approach to acute spinal cord injury management, as I'd prioritize administering riluzole promptly.

Economics: The article doesn't address cost directly, but the potential to improve outcomes for spinal cord injury patients with riluzole, which is already used for motor neuron diseases, could have significant economic implications. By reducing the need for lengthy hospital stays and rehabilitation, riluzole treatment could lead to cost savings. However, more research is needed to fully understand the economic impact.

Patient Outcomes: The study found that taking riluzole led to 58 percent "overall better outcomes" for patients who received the drug, compared to those who received a placebo. This is a significant finding, and I'd consider riluzole as a treatment option for my patients with spinal cord injuries, given its potential to improve neurological improvement, independent functioning, and quality of life. With over 80 percent of the study's patients being male, it's also essential to consider the demographic characteristics of my patients when making treatment decisions.

Transparency & Corrections

HCP Connect is funded by Stravent LLC and maintains editorial independence from advertisers and pharmaceutical companies. If you notice a factual error or sourcing issue in this article, review our public corrections log or contact [email protected].

Related Articles