Medical Research

Predict Urgent Care Visits in NSCLC Patients with 80% Accuracy

March 24, 2026
2 min read
Dr. Nikhil Chatterjee
Source:Medical Xpress

Executive Brief

  • The News: 58 patients used Fitbit devices and surveys to predict urgent care needs.
  • Clinical Win: Models with patient-reported outcomes and wearable data outperformed clinical data alone.
  • Target Specialty: Oncologists treating non-small cell lung cancer patients with systemic therapy.

Key Data at a Glance

Study Design: Machine learning model using Bayesian Networks

Sample Size: 58 patients

Primary Data Sources: Patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data

Disease Focus: Non–small cell lung cancer

Key Finding: Models with patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data outperformed models based on clinical data alone

Research Institution: Moffitt Cancer Center

Predict Urgent Care Visits in NSCLC Patients with 80% Accuracy

A study published in JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics demonstrates that machine learning models incorporating patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data can predict which patients with non–small cell lung cancer are most at risk of needing urgent care during treatment. The study was led by researchers and clinicians at Moffitt Cancer Center.

Patients undergoing systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer often experience treatment-related toxicities that can result in unplanned urgent care visits. In this study, Moffitt researchers tested whether integrating multiple sources of patient-generated health data, including self-reported quality-of-life surveys and wearable device metrics such as sleep and heart rate, could improve predictions beyond standard clinical and demographic information.

The team used explainable machine learning approaches called Bayesian Networks to build predictive models among 58 patients monitored with Fitbit devices and surveyed through a questionnaire. Machine learning models that included patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data significantly outperformed models based on clinical data alone on ability to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk patients.

"By combining information patients provide about their symptoms with continuous monitoring from wearable devices, we can better identify who is most at risk for treatment complications," said Brian D. Gonzalez, Ph.D., lead author and a researcher in Moffitt's Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior. "Our goal is to give clinicians tools to intervene earlier, improve patient experiences and potentially prevent hospitalizations."

The findings suggest that integrating multidimensional data into machine learning models may enhance personalized cancer care and allow providers to proactively address toxicities before they escalate. While the study was limited to a single center and a modest sample size, researchers say the approach holds promise for broader application.

"What makes this approach powerful is not only the accuracy of the predictions, but also the ability to understand why the model reaches those predictions," said Yi Luo, Ph.D., co-author and researcher in Moffitt's Department of Machine Learning. "By using explainable machine learning methods, we can see how factors like symptom reports, sleep quality and lab results interact to influence risk. This transparency is critical for building trust with clinicians and ensuring that the models can be used to guide real world decisions in cancer care."

Clinical Perspective — Dr. Nikhil Chatterjee, Pulmonology

Workflow: I'd modify my daily routine to incorporate patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data, like Fitbit devices, to better predict urgent care visits for non-small cell lung cancer patients. The study's use of Bayesian Networks to build predictive models among 58 patients shows promise for improving our ability to identify high-risk patients. By integrating this data, I can intervene earlier to improve patient outcomes.

Economics: The article doesn't address cost directly, but by potentially preventing hospitalizations, we're likely to see cost savings in the long run. The ability to proactively address toxicities before they escalate could also reduce the economic burden on patients and the healthcare system. However, more research is needed to quantify these potential savings.

Patient Outcomes: By combining patient-reported outcomes and wearable sensor data, we can better identify patients at risk for treatment complications, allowing for earlier intervention and potentially improving patient experiences. The study's findings suggest that integrating multidimensional data into machine learning models may enhance personalized cancer care, which could lead to better outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. This approach may help prevent unplanned urgent care visits, which can be a significant source of distress and complications for patients.

Transparency & Corrections

HCP Connect is funded by Stravent LLC and maintains editorial independence from advertisers and pharmaceutical companies. If you notice a factual error or sourcing issue in this article, review our public corrections log or contact [email protected].

Related Articles