Climate Change Impacts on Disadvantaged Communities
Discover how climate extremes affect global health disparities and vulnerable populations, informing public health strategies and medical research initiatives.
Executive Brief
- The News: 92% of excess global carbon emissions come from the Global North.
- Clinical Win: 32% of climate conference participants came from Africa, boosting local research representation.
- Target Specialty: Environmental health specialists serving disadvantaged Global South communities.
Key Data at a Glance
Global Carbon Emissions: 92% from the Global North
IPCC Author Representation: 62% from the Global North
Conference Participants: 1500 climate and environment experts
African Participation: 32% of conference participants
Global South Participation: 26% of conference participants from other regions
Catastrophic Floods: 2023 in East Africa, 2024 in West Africa
Climate Change Impacts on Disadvantaged Communities
Variable weather, powerful natural disasters, and increased climate extremes associated with anthropogenic climate change are a global phenomenon, but the impacts and implications are felt most severely by disadvantaged communities. A contrast can be seen between the regions that have most benefited from fossil fuel exploitation—the Global North, responsible for some 92% of excess global carbon emissions1—and those that are most affected by the consequences of those emissions—the Global South2,3. And while the Global South is disproportionately impacted by climate-related natural disasters, it is largely underrepresented in climate research and published literature4,5. The latest IPCC report6 does show some positive change, with the largest representation of authors from the Global South to date, but the majority of research (62% of IPCC authors) still comes from the Global North. With the goal to support robust climate research from the Global South, as an equal and essential counterpart to research from the Global North, Nature Communications and Communications Earth & Environment, launched a collection on “Weather and Climate Extremes”, with a focus on climate research from, and about, the Global South.
To stress the importance of the Global South in climate research, and in recognition of the geographical disparities in the drivers and consequences of climate change, the World Climate Research Program held its once-in-a-decade “Open Science Conference” in October 2023 in Kigali, Rwanda. The conference brought together almost 1500 climate and environment experts from all over the world, with 32% of the participants coming from Africa and 26% from other regions of the Global South. A recurrent discussion topic during the conference was the growing collaboration between research communities from the Global North and South and how, though important, it is not sufficient. Beyond collaboration, there is a need for the global community to give space for autonomy in climate research and not to tokenize communities in the Global South. Those most impacted by climate change must be able to define and prioritize their own research agenda.
In 2023 catastrophic floods hit East Africa following an unprecedented sequence of five consecutive seasons of drought7 and in 2024 deadly floods occurred in West Africa. These floods resulted in numerous casualties and damage and are an ongoing threat to food security in the region. One of the main obstacles hindering effective early warning for weather-related natural disasters in Africa is the scarcity of weather radars covering the African continent, along with their operational problems, such as the low accuracy of the delivered data8,9. 2024 also brought devastating floods in eastern Spain, in southern Brazil/northern Uruguay, and in Southeast and South Asia. Climate research in the Global South in particular is further hindered by a lack of long, reliable observational records10. Given the large internal variability that can mask the anthropogenic climate change signal, long observational records are necessary to identify and understand climate extremes. At least 30 years of continuous observations are required to define a climatic period and allow for robust conclusions, but unfortunately this is yet not realistic in many regions of the Global South, including Latin America and the Caribbean region11. Recent developments in state-of-the-art climate models, advanced statistical methods, and machine learning techniques12,13 have started to fill this observational gap14 through production of physically plausible storylines15 or thousands of years of surrogate weather conditions16. But climate model development remains slow in several regions of the Global South owing to limited understanding of certain physical processes because of lack of sufficient dedicated studies and good quality datasets, consequently leading to poor model performance9. Climate researchers in the Global South further often struggle with limited access to data and computing power9, a lack of sufficient funding for research, and language barriers as many local and regional studies are written in languages other than English and are thus less likely to be included in the IPCC assessments11.
To support climate research in the Global South, the World Climate Research Program has launched an academy to provide a knowledge hub dedicated to the promotion and advancement of lifelong learning opportunities and global equity in climate science training. It is hoped that initiatives like this will facilitate global networking and equity amongst climate scientists, and ultimately connect them so that they can collaborate on research projects. Moving forward, the international climate community should be encouraged to convene regularly in regions of the Global South that have traditionally been overlooked, and where colonialism and its manifestation in helicopter research (the practice of scientists from wealthy nations visiting lower-income countries, doing research and publishing results without the involvement of local researchers)17,18 have shaped the research landscape for centuries. More meetings in these regions will help give a voice to a currently underrepresented, but crucial, pool of researchers. It is now well accepted that for people and communities to adapt to climate change, local and indigenous knowledge must be heard and taken into account in research design and policy making, without marginalization19,20.
As a journal, we have a responsibility to recognize and overcome biases in the editorial and peer review process21 and to actively work on better representing the global research community and their priorities within our author, reviewer, and editor pools. In the “Weather and Climate Extremes” collection we sought out research from around the world, with a special focus on the Global South. The result is a collection that encompasses the unprecedented modern anthropogenic drought in Central Brazil22; identification of areas most at risk of increased drought like South and Central America, Australia, the Mediterranean, and southern Africa23; inequalities in exposure to compound drought-heatwaves under climate change, showing that low-income regions experienced a twice as fast increase in the frequency of such compound events compared to high-income regions24; the increased risk of heat-related mortality in Europe, South-East Asia and the Latin American Pacific coast over the past 20 years and its continued projected increase under higher levels of global warming25; windows of opportunity for the prediction of seasonal climate extremes, such as the 2022 floods in Pakistan26; the anthropogenic and natural drivers of intensified flash droughts in South Asia27; and other works on the drivers and impacts of extreme weather and climate.
An editorial or a collection will certainly not solve the problem of the deeply rooted inequities between the Global South and Global North, but we aspire to signal our willingness to all of those interested in helping us take some small, but persistent, steps towards a more equitable climate research landscape.
Clinical Perspective — Dr. Mohit Joshi, Psychiatry
Workflow: As I manage patients affected by climate-related disasters, I'm now more aware of the 92% of excess global carbon emissions from the Global North, which informs my approach to patient education on environmental health. With 62% of IPCC authors still from the Global North, I'd like to see more research from the Global South to better understand local impacts. This disparity makes me consider the need for more diverse perspectives in climate research.
Economics: The article doesn't address cost directly, but I'm concerned about the economic burden of climate-related natural disasters on disadvantaged communities. The fact that the Global South is disproportionately impacted by these disasters suggests that economic support for climate research and resilience-building is crucial. I'd like to see more data on the economic benefits of investing in climate research from the Global South.
Patient Outcomes: The recent catastrophic floods in East and West Africa, resulting in numerous casualties and damage, highlight the urgent need for climate research that prioritizes the needs of affected communities. With 32% of participants at the World Climate Research Program's conference coming from Africa, I'm hopeful that more research will focus on the specific challenges faced by these regions, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and more effective disaster response strategies.
Transparency & Corrections
HCP Connect is funded by Stravent LLC and maintains editorial independence from advertisers and pharmaceutical companies. If you notice a factual error or sourcing issue in this article, review our public corrections log or contact [email protected].
Drug Update Briefing