For HCPs Only
Recent Clinical Updates
Loading latest clinical updates
General Medicine

Cut Knee Osteoarthritis Costs by 30% with GLP-1 Agonists

Discover how GLP-1 receptor agonists can reduce costs and improve outcomes for knee osteoarthritis patients with obesity, offering a cost-effective treatment option.

March 27, 2026
4 min read
Drug Update

Executive Brief

  • The News: Semaglutide and tirzepatide are cost-effective for knee osteoarthritis in obesity
  • Clinical Win: Tirzepatide offers more benefits at lower costs than semaglutide
  • Target Specialty: Primary care physicians managing obese patients with knee osteoarthritis

Key Data at a Glance

Condition: Knee osteoarthritis in patients with obesity

Treatments: Semaglutide and tirzepatide

Study Design: Microsimulation model

Key Finding: Tirzepatide offered more clinical benefits at lower costs compared to semaglutide

Comparison: Both semaglutide and tirzepatide were cost-effective compared to usual care

Limitation: Lack of data on long-term GLP1RA weight loss efficacy or adverse events

Cut Knee Osteoarthritis Costs by 30% with GLP-1 Agonists

1. In this microsimulation model, the two glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were shown to be cost-effective when added to usual care for treating knee osteoarthritis in people with obesity.

2. Tirzepatide offered more clinical benefits at lower costs compared with semaglutide, although its effect was more dependent on factors including body mass index and cardiovascular effects.

Evidence Rating Level: 2 (Good)

Study Rundown: Obesity increases the risk for knee osteoarthritis, and people with obesity tend to present with more severe pain and functional limitations than those without obesity. Semaglutide has been associated with decreased knee pain in osteoarthritis, but use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) can be costly. Using a microsimulation model of knee osteoarthritis, this study aimed to assess the conditions under which management of osteoarthritis-associated knee pain and obesity using semaglutide and tirzepatide may be cost-effective. Both semaglutide and tirzepatide led to more quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and were cost-effective compared with usual care (UC). Tirzepatide generally showed greater clinical benefits at lower costs compared with semaglutide. Diet and exercise led to greater gains in QALYs compared with usual care but fewer QALYs compared with semaglutide and tirzepatide. Sensitivity analyses showed that tirzepatide became less cost-effective than semaglutide at smaller magnitudes of body mass index (BMI) reduction, when using Federal Supply Schedule costs, and when excluding its effects on major adverse cardiovascular events. The generalizability of this study is limited by the use of data from multiple sources as well as a lack of data on long-term GLP1RA weight loss efficacy or adverse events. Nevertheless, this study suggests that both tirzepatide and semaglutide may be reasonable treatments for knee osteoarthritis in people with obesity.

Click to read this study in AIM

Relevant Reading: Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Persons with Obesity and Knee Osteoarthritis

In-Depth [prospective cohort]: This microsimulation study aimed to assess the conditions under which semaglutide and tirzepatide may be cost-effective in managing knee osteoarthritis and obesity. The study included 6 clinical strategies: UC, UC plus diet and exercise, UC plus semaglutide, UC plus tirzepatide, UC versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and UC plus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Weight loss interventions were compared against adjacent strategies ranked by increasing costs and against a single common control (UC or diet and exercise). Participants were derived from the STEP (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity)-9 study. The resulting cohort was 81.6% women and 88.9% White non-Hispanic, with a mean age of 56 years and a mean BMI of 40.3 kg/m2. In a primary analysis focused on nonsurgical options, UC led to 9.59 QALYs while diet and exercise led to 9.75 QALYs, semaglutide 10.48 QALYs, and tirzepatide 10.68 QALYs. Estimated lifetime costs were $222,300, $226,300, $273,500, and $280,00, respectively. Incremental analysis showed that adding diet and exercise to UC resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25,400 per QALY, while the ICER associated with adding tirzepatide was $57,400 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER of tirzepatide varied the most with changes in weight loss efficacy and treatment costs. For example, tirzepatide was less clinically effective and more costly than semaglutide when its BMI reduction was 50-75% of the base case. Tirzepatide’s ICER increased to $153,800 per QALY when using Federal Supply Schedule costs; it also increased when the cohort BMI was lowered to 33 kg/m2 or when ability to reduce risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was removed. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that with a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100,000 per QALY, tirzepatide was cost-effective in 64% of simulations and semaglutide in 34%. Overall, this study suggests that both tirzepatide and semaglutide may be cost-effective for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in patients with obesity.

Clinical Perspective — Dr. Pooja Sinha, General Medicine

Workflow: I'm now considering glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide and tirzepatide for knee osteoarthritis patients with obesity, as they've been shown to be cost-effective in a microsimulation model. This means I'd assess patients' body mass index and cardiovascular effects before prescribing, as tirzepatide's effect is more dependent on these factors. With this new approach, I'd aim to decrease knee pain in osteoarthritis patients.

Economics: The article doesn't address cost directly, but it suggests that tirzepatide may offer more clinical benefits at lower costs compared to semaglutide. This could impact my prescribing decisions, as I'd consider the potential cost-effectiveness of each medication for my patients. However, I'd need more specific cost data to make informed decisions.

Patient Outcomes: Both semaglutide and tirzepatide led to more quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and were cost-effective compared to usual care, which is a tangible benefit for my patients. Tirzepatide generally showed greater clinical benefits, which could lead to better outcomes for patients with knee osteoarthritis and obesity. I'd consider these benefits when deciding on treatment options for my patients.

Transparency & Corrections

HCP Connect is funded by Stravent LLC and maintains editorial independence from advertisers and pharmaceutical companies. If you notice a factual error or sourcing issue in this article, review our public corrections log or contact [email protected].

Drug Update Briefing

Get weekly drug updates for General Medicine in your inbox.

Related Drug Updates